Cited by 20Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesForest Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coptis teeta-based Agroforestry System and Its Conservation Potential: A Case Study from Northwest Yunnan

Huang, Ji, Long, Chunlin·2007·AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment

Abstract

Coptis teeta (Ranunculaceae), is a nontimber forest product (NTFP) that only grows in northwest Yunnan and northeast India. Its tenuous rhizome, known as "Yunnan goldthread" in the traditional Chinese medicine system, has been used as an antibacterial and as an antiinflammatory medicine for a long time. The increasing demand has resulted in commercial harvesting pressure on wild populations that were already dwindling as a result of deforestation, and wild populations are at risk of extinction. Fortunately, there exists at least 2000 hectares of a C. teeta-based agroforestry system initiated by the Lisu people in Nujiang, northwest Yunnan. This cultivation supplies us with a valuable study case for the balance between conservation and sustainable use. This case study investigated the traditional management system and history of C. teeta in Nujiang through ethnobotanical methods and field investigation. We also contrasted initial costs, economic returns, and labor demands for C. teeta cultivation with other major land uses in the region. Compared with swidden agriculture, the major land-use type in the region, C. teeta cultivation offers high economic returns and low labor and initial costs; moreover, C. teeta cultivation does not interfere with subsistence agricultural duties. This agroforestry system reflected that the cultivation of NTFPs is a conservation strategy for maintaining forest diversity, while providing a stable economic return to local forest communities, and indicates how local people manage biodiversity effectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[343:ctasai]2.0.co;2

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bawa, 1992, Tree, 7, 361
  2. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, 2003, People and Plants working paper 12. World Wildlife Fund,, 35
  3. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, 2004, People and Plants working paper 13., 33
  4. Cunningham, 1993, People and Plants working paper 1., 35
  5. Cunningham, 1993, People and Plants working paper 2., 25
  6. Cunningham, 2002, People and Plants working paper 10., 32
  7. Cunningham, 1996, People and Plants working paper 4., 48
  8. Wild, 1996, People and Plants working paper 5., 40
  9. Maundu, 2001, People and Plants working paper 8., 32
  10. Aumeeruddy, 1994, People and Plants working paper 3., 36
  11. Martin, 2002, People and Plants working paper 9., 77
  12. Pei, 1994, Himalayan Ecosystems., 114
  13. Pei, 1998, Frontiers in Biology. The Challenge of Biodiversity, Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture., 223
  14. Lama, 2002, WWF Nepal/People and Plants, Kathmandu,, 150
  15. Myers, 2000, Science, 403, 853
  16. Li, 1994, Proceedings of Symposium on Biodiversity Conservation in Yunnan: 1994., 23
  17. Huang, 2004, Acta Bot. Yunnanica, 26, 255
  18. Mudgal, 1980, Bull. Bot. Survey India, 22, 1
  19. Huang, 2005, Chinese Tradition. Herb. Drugs, 36, 1139
  20. Olsen, 1999, Medicinal Plant Conservation, Vol. 5, IUCN/SSC/MPSG,, 1
  21. Sugandhi, 1995, J. Non-Timber For. Prod., 2, 83

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review

    Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96

    “As another example, in China, agroforestry practices with Coptis teeta and Toxicodendron vernicifluum trees on different arable crop fields generated higher net annual income compared to the swidden practice (Huang and Long 2007).”

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Huang, J., & Long, C.
Affiliations
Kunming Institute of Botany (CN)
Venue
AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
Published
2007-06
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
343-349
ISSN
0044-7447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992339588
Cited by
20
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AMBIO (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
Coptis teeta, agroforestry, non-timber forest products, traditional Chinese medicine, Lisu people, Nujiang, ethnobotany, sustainable use, biodiversity conservation, wild population decline, swidden agriculture, economic returns, labor demand, Northwest Yunnan
MeSH terms
China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Forestry, Ecosystem, Coptis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coptis teeta-based Agroforestry System and Its Conservation Potential: A Case Study from Northwest Yunnan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36%5B343:ctasai%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Huang, J., & Long, C. (2007). Coptis teeta-based Agroforestry System and Its Conservation Potential: A Case Study from Northwest Yunnan. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36%5B343%3Actasai%5D2.0.co%3B2